Agentic Applications

Full-stack agentic applications built for real work.

We design and deliver the interface, runtime, state, tools, approvals and infrastructure, plus the evaluation suite and handover, as one complete application.

Qualify the application before choosing the architecture

An agent is justified when the task changes as information arrives, requires dynamic tool selection, or cannot be expressed safely as one fixed flow.

If reliable deterministic software can complete the same work with lower cost and less uncertainty, the deterministic path should remain in control.

/01

Standalone delivery

A complete web, desktop, mobile, or dedicated operational product with its own users, runtime, state, and infrastructure.

/02

Embedded delivery

Agentic capabilities inside an existing software product, inheriting its identity, tenancy, permissions, navigation, and design system.

/03

Hybrid execution

Deterministic business rules govern predictable work while agentic decisions handle only the genuinely variable parts.

The complete application layer

/01

Interface

Purpose-built views for input, progress, artifacts, comparisons, edits, approvals, exceptions, and completion.

/02

Runtime and state

Persistent execution with task state, queues, checkpoints, resumability, cancellation, and safe failure behavior.

/03

Tools and systems

Approved access to APIs, data, documents, browsers, code environments, or existing applications.

/04

Human control

Explicit review, confirmation, escalation, and intervention around consequential actions.

/05

Security and tenancy

Authentication, authorization, scoped credentials, tenant isolation, budgets, and audit history.

/06

Evaluation

Scenario suites, environment outcome checks, repeated trials, traces, failure recovery, and release gates.

Owned demonstration

Inspect the application boundary before trusting the output

Our fictional supplier-change fixture shows a complete input-to-evaluation path without presenting a customer name or invented result.

DualWeb-owned reference demonstration

This non-customer inspection fixture shows the architecture and evidence trail for a fictional supplier-change review. It is not a customer result, performance benchmark, or claim of unattended execution.

  1. TRACE 01

    Input

    A reviewer provides a change packet, the affected account, the decision policy, and the allowed action scope.

  2. TRACE 02

    Tools + state

    The runtime retrieves approved documents and records each source, tool result, case state, and unresolved constraint.

  3. TRACE 03

    Approval

    A proposed record update is displayed with its source evidence and remains paused until an authorized reviewer confirms it.

  4. TRACE 04

    Artifact

    The application prepares a decision memo, cited evidence list, exception register, and the approved action receipt.

  5. TRACE 05

    Evaluation

    The release fixture checks required sources and fields, the approval boundary, the resulting record state, and safe behavior when a tool fails.

Long-running work needs an execution lifecycle

  1. 01

    Start with an explicit objective

    Record the user, context, constraints, permissions, budgets, and expected outcome.

  2. 02

    Expose progress and artifacts

    Show what is running, what has completed, the evidence collected, and what needs attention.

  3. 03

    Pause for consequential actions

    Present the proposed action and relevant context before committing a write or external side effect.

  4. 04

    Recover without losing the task

    Retry bounded failures, preserve checkpoints, allow cancellation, and route unresolved exceptions to a person.

Reliability, security, and ownership

/01

Human approvals

Consequential writes stop at explicit, reviewable confirmation points rather than disappearing inside a conversation.

/02

Permissions and tenancy

Every tool action is constrained by the current user, account, tenant, role, and approved scope.

/03

Recovery

Long-running work has defined retries, resumable state, cancellation, and safe behavior when a dependency fails.

/04

Limits

Action, time, and cost budgets are visible and enforced at the runtime boundary.

/05

Audit history

Tool calls, approvals, changes, outputs, and failure paths remain inspectable after the task finishes.

/06

Outcome evaluation

Release decisions use task completion and environment state, not a model's confidence in its own answer.

A staged engagement with review gates

  1. 01

    Blueprint

    Define the user, outcome, system boundaries, tool access, approval points, and acceptance scenarios before implementation begins.

  2. 02

    Working vertical slice

    Connect one meaningful workflow end to end so interface, state, permissions, and runtime behavior can be reviewed together.

  3. 03

    Production build

    Complete the application surface, integrations, background execution, tenancy, observability, and operational controls.

  4. 04

    Evaluation and security

    Exercise success paths, tool failures, recovery, consequential actions, permission boundaries, cost limits, and regression scenarios.

  5. 05

    Deployment and handover

    Deploy into the agreed client-controlled environment and transfer source, configuration, tests, evaluation fixtures, documentation, and runbooks.

A clear ownership boundary

Frequently asked questions

What does a full-stack agentic build include?

Scope determines the exact package, but it normally includes the user interface, runtime, state model, tools, permissions, human approvals, infrastructure configuration, evaluations, tests, documentation, and handover.

Can you embed an agent in an existing product?

Yes. Embedded delivery preserves the product's existing identity, tenant context, permissions, navigation, and interface patterns while adding bounded agentic workflows.

Can the application use MCP internally?

Yes. A complete application may consume MCP servers as part of its architecture. Ownership is determined by the final deliverable, so a full application remains a DualWeb engagement.

Do you promise unattended automation?

No. Consequential actions require controls appropriate to their impact, including scopes, approval gates, budgets, logs, and safe fallback behavior.

Build the complete application, not just the demo.

Start with the user, the work, the systems involved, and the actions that need human approval.

Discuss a project